Tech leaders’ responses to Trump on Muslim ban was too weak
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on Reddit
Share on Email

Protest sign from an Immigration Policy rally. Sign reads "No Human Being is Illegal" Photo Credit: VallarieE / Getty Images Israel

Some responses felt on point while others are truly lacking any backbone

A lot has been said about President Donald Trump’s outreach to the tech sphere, and what the proper response should be from industry leaders.

While some like Peter Thiel have shown themselves to be long time supporters of the highly controversial president, others have couched their statements with an eye to keeping the cogs of business running in uncertain times.

This approach has its place as a CEO’s first loyalty theoretically should be to their shareholders. However these are not normal times, and it can be argued that tech leaders have an outsized responsibility to represent the values of the connected world in the information age.

The business of technology and information services are by their nature a global endeavor, and as such, should reject such vile notions that discriminate against other humans based on conditions such as their race, religion, or country of origin.

Silicon Valley, like nearly every other center of technology in the US and elsewhere, is heavily populated by immigrants. These are talented people who come with the dream of a better life, seeking the opportunity to build something incredible. In fact, perhaps as never before in American history, many of the leaders of this industry are themselves immigrants to this country.

So how are these new captains of industry speaking out in the face of the threat coming from Trump and his executive order against refugees, migrants and visitors from Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and Libya?

From the basic look of it, some are doing better than others. A few are offering their support not only to their employees but others who are simply in need of help.

In a post made to LinkedIn, which I guess they are using as their new default blog post spot since they bought it last year, Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella wrote that:

“As an immigrant and as a CEO, I’ve both experienced and seen the positive impact that immigration has on our company, for the country, and for the world. We will continue to advocate on this important topic.”

The company like others including Google have directed their legal teams to aid their employees who may find themselves stuck outside the US.

Their CEO Sundar Pichai highlighted the case of one of his employees, looking to offer support and bring attention to the tumult that such decisions have on the lives of real people.

As a private citizen and an immigrant himself, Google co-founder Sergey Brin took a more active step and showed up to a protest against the order in San Francisco.

Of course, Marc Zuckerberg made his voice heard, bringing in personal anecdotes.

Still others took to Twitter to issue their statements, each with varied effectiveness in our opinion.

Twitter’s statement felt bland, issuing a standard message of support that while important, lacked the sense of outrage and opposition that many felt the situation called for.

CEO Jack Dorsey did not appear to be much more energetic in his posting, apparently choosing to draw more attention to the effect that such measures could have on the economy as well.

Hearing from another immigrant who danced around the point, Musk stated that:

Musk like others including Apple’s Tim Cook, have been in contact with the Trump administration as a part of the president’s outreach to the community. It perhaps falls even heavier on people like Musk to take a stand in letting the administration know that this order is beyond not being “not the best way to address the country’s challenges,” but an anathema to the ethos of the tech community.

Thankfully, there were some voices that proposed more action than others.

While I am not generally a fan of AirBnB for social reasons, their CEO Brian Chesky deserves good marks for his more empathetic remarks.

Chesky offered those denied entry free housing to deal with the situation. While probably not a wide reaching solution, it was nice to hear that he wanted to pitch in.

A force in the tech community, Chris Sacca posted that he will match up to $75,000 in donations to the ACLU, with Lyft coming out with a pledge to give $1 million over the next few years.

Still, if there was one company that got truly trashed from this story today, it was Uber. After sending out a tweet that they had turned off surge pricing at JFK in the midst of a Taxi Workers’ Alliance strike against picking up fares at the New York airport as a protest of the ban, they were hit by a wave of users tweeting pictures of themselves deleting their Uber accounts under the hashtag #deleteuber.

CEO Travis Kalanick like Musk is also in contact with the administration, and bears additional responsibility to push for change. The company has stated that they will take the step of compensating their workers who are stuck overseas due to the ban, but they may still find it difficult to shake off the dust from this scuffle.

My thoughts

It is understandable that the heads of companies would want to walk as close to the center as possible, not taking sides in disputes over government (or if possible any) policy as it can cause them to quickly bleed customers.

As the Republicans now control the Congress, it will make perfect sense for the tech giants to direct their lobbying efforts towards the party in charge. Politics are messy, and we are all entitled to have a variety of opinions. Monoliths and litmus tests cause stagnation and cut down on inclusiveness as well.

But in the social age, where we choose our technology companies not only because they give us good service but because we believe that they hold our values, they will have to make a choice. A commitment to diversity is one of those values. When specific government policies pass the red line of acceptable behavior, there is no choice but to speak out more strongly than before.

Hopefully those with the president’s ear will make their opposition heard. If not, then they must have the courage and wisdom to walk away.

Share on:Share
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on Reddit
Share on Email
Gabriel Avner

About Gabriel Avner

Gabriel has an unhealthy obsession with new messaging apps, social media and pretty much anything coming out of Apple. An experienced security and conflict consultant, he has written for The Diplomatic Club, the Marine War College, and covers military affairs with TLV1 radio. He mostly enjoys reading articles wherever his ADD leads him to and training Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. EEED 44D4 B8F4 24BE F77E 2DEA 0243 CBD1 3F7C F4B6

More Goodies From News

Toong inks strategic partnership to help Singapore companies enter Vietnam

Russia in talks with US to create cybersecurity working group

FBI warns parents: Internet-connected toys can spy on your kids