Israeli toolbar giant Conduit expected to split and acquire Perion
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on Reddit
Share on Email

The purpose of this structural shakeup is to pave the way for a reverse merger. The new entity will see Conduit handling toolbars and Perions activities in the form of an old/new company already listed on the NASDAQ

conduit-Logo

According to information obtained by Geektime, Israeli toolbar giant Conduit has been trying to close a merger in what may prove to be one of the most complex acquisitions made in recent years.

Sources reveal that Conduit plans on splitting the existing $1.5 billion company into two entities, each to deal with a separate core functionality: One company will be run by Josh Wine, who currently runs the company’s toolbar division, responsible for an estimated $200-300 million of the company’s $800 million revenue.

A second company, headed by current CEO Ronen Shilo, is expected to handle all mobile activity and development not directly related to toolbars – such as building systems for mobile websites, lock screens and the company’s own mobile Web browser.

In addition, recent reports reveal negotiations between Conduit and Perion in what would amount to a reverse merger.

According to reports, Conduit plans on acquiring Perion for an estimated $150-200 million. Perion is a publicly-traded company founded by Ofer and Yaron Adler in the early 2000s and has built up its success based on the same business model as Conduit; namely developing toolbars and seeking out strategic partnerships with known search giants.

Unlike Conduit, Perion decided to go public, issuing an IPO on the NASDAQ and at their last trading closing their value stood at $146.36 million after a late day rally of 8.42 percent.

The purpose of this structural shakeup is to pave the way for a reverse merger, a move generally carried out to allow a private company to go public by occupying the shell of an already public company, avoiding the complex hassle of filing for a public offering.

The new entity will see Conduit handling toolbars and Perion’s activities in the form of an old/new company already listed on the NASDAQ.

Making sense out of this

So now after we explained what’s going on, let’s try to make some sense of it. Ultimately, if and when this complex merger goes through, the facts on the ground are expected to be two separate companies:

1) Conduit/Perion – a merged company under the direction of Josh Wine from Conduit, which will handle the operations of Conduit’s toolbars and various Web activities of Perion.

The company is expected to be traded as a public offering valued at over $1.5 billion.

2) Conduit Mobile – a ‘new startup’, which would be privately-owned and continue the development of various products outside the realm of Conduit’s toolbars.

The new company is expected to be valued in the tens of millions from day one due to the sheer breadth of the company’s activity, despite the fact that it will not of had the chance to generate any revenue yet.

Why is this happening?

One of the key reasons for this move (if not the main one) is the desire for Conduit’s investors to realize a return on their investment once they have a chance to sell of some shares on the open market.

Conduit’s management, and especially CEO Ronen Shilo, said several times that the company has no desire to go public and they have “enough money” to avoid doing so. They don’t need the public who mostly just makes noise and keeps the company from being able to develop.

The structure of the transaction, which will allow the company to take its profitable activities and move them over to a public company, will provide investors with a relatively quick exit without having to deal with the standard filings that generally take several months or sometimes longer than a year to complete.

It also helps avoid the clash between those investors who want to IPO and those who inevitably raise objections fearing a devaluation once the company hits the public market.

Sources close to both companies confirmed that there were contacts between the two companies, but refused to elaborate on the content. We turned to both companies for comment and will update if and when information comes in.

Share on:Share
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Google+
Share on Reddit
Share on Email
Yaniv Feldman

About Yaniv Feldman


Chief-Geek at GeekTime. An Entrepreneur at heart with technology running in his veins. Yaniv has been writing about and analyzing the Israeli and European startup and technology scene for the past 5 years and his favorite hobby is finding complicated solutions to very simple problems.

More Goodies From Industry


Endless Lima traffic spawns innovative startups

New concept: Booking meeting rooms at the heart of Tel Aviv by the hour

Beginnings and beyond: a snapshot of Cisco’s investments in Israel 

  • MyPlayCity awarded a $500,001 judgment against Conduit

    A jury in the United States District Court for Southern District of New York recently held that Conduit was liable to MyPlayCity for $500,001. The jury concluded that Conduit had unjustly enriched itself by continuing to distribute MyPlayCity’s toolbar bearing MyPlayCity’s trademark after the contract between the parties ended, and keeping all of the revenues which it received.

    for more info: http://docs.myplaycity.com/mpc_press_release_2.pdf

  • AJGrayTay

    Conduit is the Israeli tech scene’s biggest embarrassment. Hate the company.